Coaching

= **Martina Maculova**  = = **Céline Pierrot**  = = **Phillippe Olives**  = = **Low cost presentation (Team A)**  =
 * If there are images in this attachment, they will not be displayed.** [|Download the original attachment]

**Pascal Luer:** - Communication: Body language – OK, but beware of the hands in the pockets Eye contact – good contact with audience Fluency – good pronunciation Overall effect – good communication skills **Jean-Sebastien Martinez:** - Communication: Body language – OK, employs gestures very well Eye contact – good contact with audience Fluency – little too quick, but OK Overall effect – good vocabulary **Jessica Lesaunier:** - communication: Body language – little bit nervous, but she managed it very well Eye contact – good contact with audience Fluency – just one little pause, otherwise OK Overall effect – good, she worked hard **Florent Orsero:** - Communication: Body language – very good, natural speaker Eye contact – good contact with audience Fluency – good articulation Overall effect – good communication skills, talking easily to audience - Slides: Intelligibility – OK, KISS (keep it simple and smart) principle Aesthetics – aesthetically pleasing, very good design of Power point Good work with a picture on every slide - Arguments: Cogency – medium Coherence – good Pertinence – well planned arguments To conclude, we would like to resume three positives aspects of the presentation. So, the first one is that the presentation was based on the arguments that were said in the correct way with a good connection to the power point. Second point is that the presenters kept all the time a contact with their audience so it was easier for them to understand the topic. The last is that the power point was coherent with what the presenters said. However, we found one negative aspect. Sometimes, the presenters were hesitating and in the other hand they were speaking too fast.